Why does the government seek to chill crypto adoption? 
For the past decade, the US government has stifled crypto adoption through various means
Good afternoon, friends!
I was recently featured towards the end of a Bitcoin Magazine piece that was a retrospective of the last decade of US persecution of cryptocurrency personalities. It started with Ross Ulbricht and moved forward through the past ten years of both his case and others who have been targeted by the government.
I feel like it’s a worthy read and it’s certainly worth checking out. If only to get a better grounding in what the US government has been doing to crypto innovators and enthusiasts who have been pushing boundaries. Not to put too fine a point on it, but the article writer even questions what might have happened to Satoshi Nakamoto, had they not remained pseudonymous.
Now, before I ended up in the Federal prison camp at Beaumont, I had a hard time thinking of myself as a political prisoner. It’s arriving and thinking about other Bitcoiners in similar situations as me, I find myself puzzling out how I ended up here and why.
It raises the question of why is the government anti-innovation. I don’t know if there’s a clear answer to that – sometimes they are slow to adopt, but not always; sometimes there are times of high innovation and even entire sectors are subject to prolonged innovative funding such as the military-industrial complex.
Does this lead to questions such as what does this government brand of innovation tend to feed? Does it tend to feed the “war machine?” Absolutely. Does it end up feeding entrenched power structures? Almost always.
Blockchain, however, feeds decentralization – which in turn feeds liberty and freedom with fewer guardrails protecting the entrenched power structures of society. I believe that this is why we are in the “now they fight us” stage of blockchain innovation. They realize that it’s too late to stop blockchain adoption and they now are trying to fence it in through various and sundry means.
Ultimately, though, I believe they will lose this battle.
Why? Well, the government has not unified its opposition. If you look at certain sectors of politics there’s a growing number of politicians that tend to support the blockchain lobby. Primarily because a larger number of them see it as a growing constituency even as the bureaucracy sees it as a threat. One prominent example is Sen. Cynthia Lummis of Wyoming who bought Bitcoin in 2013 and still holds it now.
The bigger reason that I believe that they will lose this battle is that blockchain is a poison pill. You see this pattern over and over through capitalism, where an industry believes if a little bit is good, therefore more must be better. Enterprise tech and fintech have seen modest to significant gains on the back of blockchains starting most notably when IBM bet the farm on AI and blockchain technology.
This has created a poison pill for large institutions where they planted the seed of their own decentralization.
If you enjoy liberty and innovation, it’s up to you and me to water and tend this garden so that it flourishes and grows.
Thank you for your support!
If you enjoy this newsletter, you'll want to check these links out.
💛 - Send this email to a friend! Even if you’re on the paid version. It’ll get someone else interested, and possibly subscribed!
₿ - I'm the VP at Geosyn Mining, a datacenter for co-locating your bitcoin mining equipment. If you want to learn more about how you can mine bitcoin directly, drop me a line here.
🦢 - Have you started investing in Bitcoin yet? You’ve read about Dollar Cost Averaging, but don’t know where to start? I endorse Swan Bitcoin as a great tool for setting up a disciplined investment regimen, and many of you do, too! If you sign up with this link, I get $10 to help support my efforts with this newsletter.
📧 - Did you get this emailed to you? Click here to try a premium subscription out free for 14-days (generally, two issues).
Mastercard and Paxos launch crypto trading services for customers. Credit card giant Mastercard has tapped regulated blockchain platform Paxos to allow banks and financial institutions crypto trading services to their customers, reported CoinTelegraph.
Blockchain infrastructure firm ChainSafe raises $18.75M for decentralized gaming. ChainSafe, a blockchain infrastructure firm that provides developers a way to connect their apps easily to Web3, has announced an $18.75 million funding round with a focus on blockchain gaming, reported CoinDesk.
Blockchain Behind the Scenes
Jack Dorsey’s Bluesky announces waitlist for decentralized social media platform. BlueSky, an open-source project launched by former CEO of Twitter Jack Dorsey, has announced that it is launching a decentralized social media platform soon.
Celestia Labs is building modular blockchain networks with $55M in funding. Modular blockchain developer Celestia Labs announced it raised $55M in new funding to provide developers with a way to rapidly deploy, scale, and build blockchains by separating data and execution layers.
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Ask Doctor Bitcoin to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.